Tuesday, 13 August 2013

Evolution of Management Theory...

Historical Background of Management

Management origin not clearly traced in history. However, it would not be wrong to say that it is as old as the origin of human beings.
    • Modern Management began in the late 19th c.
    • Organization were seeking ways to better satisfy customer needs.
    • Machinery was changing the way goods were produced.
    • Managers had to increase the efficiency of the worker-task mix.
    • Planning, organizing, leading and controlling became necessary.

Early Management Theories
    • Early Theories of Organization  merged mainly from military and Catholic Church. The symbol of the machine was dominant, where Organization are viewed as machines. Therefore, the organizational application was, since workers behave predictably, management knows what to expect, and workers operating outside expectations are replaced.
Modern mgt is the collaboration of people and machines to create value. In the early days of industrialization the innovators of machines and the innovators of organization and management were engineers. Engineers, after all, were the ones closest to the machines, and this fact placed them at the interaction of workers and machines. This certainly helps explain Frederick Taylor and his invention of "Scientific Management".

CLASSICAL MANAGEMENT THEORIES
      ▪ Emerged in the early part of the 20th c.
      ▪ Models were military and the Catholic Church.
      ▪ Features
        • Strict CONTROL of workers
        • Absolute CHAINS of COMMAND
        • PREDICTABILITY of behavior
        • UNIDIRECTIONAL downward influence
There are 3 well-established theories of classical mgt:
      • Taylor’s Theory of Scientific Management,
      • Fayol’s Administrative Theory,
      • Weber’s Theory of Bureaucracy.
However, Fayol’s Administrative Theory and Weber’s Theory of Bureaucracy emphasize development of managerial principles rather than work methods.






SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT THEORY The search for efficiency started
with the study of how managers could improve person–task relationships to
increase efficiency. The concept of job specialization and division of labour
remains the basis for the design of work settings in modern organizations. New
developments like lean production and total quality management are often viewed
as advances on the early scientific management principles developed by Taylor
and the Gilbreths.

ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT THEORY 
Max Weber and Henri Fayol outlined principles of bureaucracy and administration that are as relevant
to managers today as when they were written at the turn of the twentieth century.
Much of modern management research refines these principles to suit
contemporary conditions. For example, the increasing interest in the use of crossdepartmental
teams and the empowerment of workers are issues that managers
also faced a century ago.

BEHAVIOURAL MANAGEMENT THEORY Researchers have described
many different approaches to managerial behaviour, including Theories X and Y.
Often, the managerial behaviour that researchers suggest reflects the context of
their own historical era and culture. Mary Parker Follett advocated managerial
behaviours that did not reflect accepted modes of managerial behaviour at the
time, but her work was largely ignored until conditions changed.

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE THEORY The various branches of management
science theory provide rigorous quantitative techniques that give managers
more control over their organization’s use of resources to produce goods
and services.

ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENT THEORY The importance of
studying the organization’s external environment became clear after the development
of open-systems theory and contingency theory during the 1960s. A main
focus of contemporary management research is to find methods to help managers
improve the way they utilize organizational resources and compete successfully in
the global environment. Strategic management and total quality management are
two important approaches intended to help managers make better use of organizational
resources.


No comments:

Post a Comment